Scholars Debunk Sheikh Swaleh Mubiru’s Teachings
A selected sub-committee of eminent Islamic scholars, under the stewardship of Dr. Sheikh Ziyadi Swaleh Lubanga, Phd in Sharia, the Director of Sharia at Uganda Muslim Supreme Council-UMSC, has compiled a detailed report addressing the disputed Islamic teachings propagated by Sheikh Swaleh Mubiru. The committee was constituted by the UMSC National Management Committee under the guidance of Dr. Sheikh Shaban Ramadhan Mubaje, the Mufti, following a series of exchanges and personal attacks between Sheikh Mubiru and several Muslim clerics over doctrines described as false, misleading, and divisive among Muslim believers. The committee members include Sheikh Salim Bbosa, the Deputy Director of Sharia at Uganda Muslim Supreme Council-UMSC, Sheikh Uthuman Kibuuka, Sheikh Nadawi Galimaka Kaluuma, Sheikh Imran Abdunoor Ssali, Sheikh Muhammad Murshid Luwemba, and Sheikh Ali Juma Shiwuyu. The National Management Committee, chaired by the Mufti, first held a live interaction with Sheikh Mubiru at the UMSC headquarters on October 7th, 2025. During the session, Sheikh Mubiru reaffirmed his belief in the four sources of Islamic jurisprudence—the Holy Quran, Hadith, consensus (Ijma), and analogy—recognized by all major Islamic scholars. It was resolved to hold a follow-up scholarly engagement on October 13, 2025, to examine the remaining doctrines. During the subsequent meeting, Sheikh Mubiru was given ample time to present his doctrines, which centered on his rejection of the divine messages revealed to Prophets Dawud (David) and Isa (Jesus), namely the Zabur (Psalms) and Injil (Gospels). He also rejected the Muslim salutations of peace, Assalaam Alaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh (Peace and God’s blessings be upon you), and the practice of raising one’s voice in personal prayers (supplications) when beseeching Almighty Allah for favors. While Sheikh Mubiru explained his beliefs referencing various Quranic verses, the committee members responded with scholarly interpretations supported by Hadith collected by classical Islamic theologians over centuries. Despite these clarifications, Sheikh Mubiru remained unconvinced and requested more time to consolidate his arguments for the next meeting. A few days later, Sheikh Mubiru wrote to the Mufti requesting the replacement of the session chair, Dr. Sheikh Ziyadi Swaleh Lubanga, alleging bias, and proposed that the Mufti chair the next session. The committee refuted these claims, stating that Sheikh Mubiru had been given sufficient time and that no bias was exhibited by the session chair. Following these events, the committee conducted research to verify Sheikh Mubiru’s formal Islamic theological training. Their findings revealed several concerns. Although Sheikh Mubiru claims to have studied at King Saud University, specializing in Aqedah (the Essence of Islamic Faith) within the Education Department, he lacks sufficient Islamic theological training. He has limited command of Arabic, including idioms, grammar, and rhetorical styles, which are essential for understanding Islamic theology. King Saud University’s Education Faculty primarily trains teachers, not Islamic theologians, meaning Sheikh Mubiru’s studies were largely secular. Two of his contemporaries corroborated this finding. The committee further observed that Sheikh Mubiru’s doctrines follow a Quran-only (Quraniyuni) ideology, a pattern historically associated with anti-Muslim groups aiming to sow discord among the faithful. They likened this to similar sectarian hypocrisies observed during the time of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Based on these findings, the committee recommended that the UMSC issue a public statement disassociating itself from the ten doctrines propagated by Sheikh Swaleh Mubiru, clarifying that they are not part of Islamic theology and mislead believers without contributing to spiritual growth or practical









